On July 1, 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle took part in a 20-minute virtual conversation with young leaders and anti-racist activists as part of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust. They discussed the importance of fighting for equality, the need for increased awareness of “institutional racism,” and the Commonwealth’s obligation to acknowledge, confront, and correct historical wrongs. Additionally, they discussed the importance of developing a new generation of young leaders to continue the fight for equality and justice for all.
“The world is craving healing,” Meghan, who is still vice-president of the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust, said. “Equality does not put anyone on the back foot, it puts us all on the same footing, which is a fundamental human right and that’s what we’re talking about here.”
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are not the first or last to advocate for change and urge the public to combat racism, examine implicit biases, assess personal privilege, and take action to disrupt power dynamics where necessary.
The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is observed annually on March 21st. It was first declared by the United Nations in 1966. This day is intended to serve as a time of reflection and remembrance for the hundreds of people who were severely injured and the 69 people who died in South Africa as a result of a brutal police shooting in 1960. The United Nations focuses on a different theme each year. The theme for 2022 was “Voices for Action Against Racism,” emphasising the importance of people uniting and strengthening their voices against racial injustice, “mobilising against all forms and manifestations of racial discrimination and ensuring a safe environment for those who speak out.”
Indeed, an increasing number of people are speaking up and speaking out. It appears as though anti-racism activists, social justice campaigners, and ordinary citizens have been given an official mandate to call out racism whenever they see it, regardless of how minor or trivial. And no one should have any reservations about this. Racial prejudice has long been a thorn in humanity’s side, and it should not be overlooked because, as we have seen throughout history and modern times, it has served as the primary motivator for some of the most heinous events in human history.
In the eyes of many, racism seems to be getting worse in society and racist remarks, actions, behaviours, and incidents seem to be on the rise. Almost every week, a new video circulates on the internet of a person – usually white – apparently caught in the act of doing or saying something racist. Typically, the media seizes on these incidents and uses them to highlight, if not exacerbate, the problem of racism in society. While such people argue that racism is becoming more prevalent, others argue that racism has always been prevalent and is only becoming more visible as people become more educated about the issue and better technology is available to capture incidents. Even so, some argue that the term “racism” is being used to refer to a broad range of behaviours and attitudes that are not necessarily racist in nature, and that the term is being used as a catch-all term to refer to any behaviour or attitude that is perceived as simply negative, particularly when it involves a member of a so-called marginalised racial group.
Having said that, while genuine incidents of racism have been identified and, more often than not, dealt with appropriately, there have been numerous unfounded claims of racism made against several people in recent years, causing more divisions in a society that appears to still be struggling to come to terms with a past influenced by racial inequality.
Many parts of the world appear unwaveringly committed to moving toward inclusivity, diversity, and equity, as well as moving past, and sometimes even erasing, their history of racism. Therefore, false and baseless accusations of racism may lead to more regression than the desired progression and can cause more rifts among groups than actual instances of racism.
When one thinks of false claims of racism, one name immediately comes to mind: Jussie Smollett, the black Empire actor who orchestrated a hate crime and claimed to have been the victim of a racist and homophobic attack. Following widespread media coverage and a police investigation, he was arrested and charged with making a false police report and misusing police time and resources. Smollett was believed to have staged the incident to boost his profile and promote his career, as he was dissatisfied with his $65,000-per-episode income on Empire. His case demonstrates how racism can be used for personal gain.
Smollett was rightfully held accountable for his negligent actions. He received a 150-day prison sentence and was ordered to pay a $145,000 fine. He still maintains his innocence and has even recently recorded a song named “You Got the Wrong One” following his release from prison, which looked to contain lyrics implying he had been unfairly imprisoned.
While Smollett’s situation is peculiar, it is by no means unusual. He claimed to have been the victim of a hate crime and faked his own attack. Despite this, he bore the repercussions.
This article discusses instances in which false allegations of racism are levelled deliberately and maliciously against others, with the accusers facing little or no consequences for their conduct.
Even though little research has been done on the psychosocial and psychological consequences of false accusations of racism, being falsely accused of being a racist can have serious negative consequences for both the individuals who are falsely accused and even the groups to which they belong. This is typically because an individual’s actions are usually linked back to the identity group they belong to, resulting in the reinforcement of stereotypes and other preconceived notions about various ethnic groups.
Nobody is immune to false racist accusations. It can affect otherwise decent workers, such as Dominque Moran, a restaurant manager who was wrongly labelled a racist and became the target of vile online abuse following the viral video of her allegedly refusing to serve a group of black men. However, as is frequently the case, there was another side to the story. It was later revealed that the group of men portrayed as the innocent victims were known to “dine and dash,” meaning they would eat at restaurants but then flee when the bill arrived. However, by the time the facts of the incident were fully revealed, Moran had already lost her job and had received hundreds of messages vilifying and threatening her and her family. Not only that, but she found herself dealing with fear, paranoia, distrust, and shame, demonstrating the psychological battles one can face if they find themselves in such a situation. Moran eventually found work, but the incident left her with a sense of vulnerability she had never felt before.
One disadvantage of not waiting for all of the facts is that it is possible to misconstrue what someone says or does. In an era when information is disseminated quickly, people rarely wait to understand the specifics of an incident. There have even been a few instances where the internet mob was so desperate to track down the perpetrator—for the sole purpose of making their lives a living hell—that the wrong person was accused.
On October 25, 2020, four women in Coventry, UK, were subjected to racial abuse as they attempted to enter a taxi. The perpetrator was quickly identified after the video went viral and his photos and social media handles were posted online. The only issue was that the incorrect individual was identified. Barney Schneider, a fourth-year Coventry University student, was mistaken for the man in the video due to an uncanny resemblance, despite the fact that he was not in the city at the time of the incident. Despite this, he was viciously attacked online, received threatening messages, and his expulsion from his university was demanded. As was the case with Dominique Moran, even after the facts of the case were revealed, it did not change the fact that he had to endure such unforgiving and wrathful abuse, to the point where leaving his home became dangerous on some days.
As previously stated, no one is immune to false allegations of racism. An older incident highlights how even public officials can be subjected to false accusations of racism. Shirley Sherrod, Georgia State Director of Rural Development, was fired on July 19, 2010, as a result of media reports on video excerpts from a March 2010 event at which she addressed members of the NAACP. Sherrod’s remarks were condemned as racist and unacceptable and there were calls for her resignation. Nonetheless, a review of her entire speech revealed that the excerpts were edited and that her remarks were actually about the importance of overcoming personal prejudices. The White House and NAACP officials later apologised for their previous criticisms, but this did not negate Shirley Sherrod’s ordeal, which included character defamation and the loss of a significant position.
Genuine racism manifests itself in a variety of ways and contexts. Discrimination, prejudice, and hatred directed at an individual based on their race, national origin, or ethnic origin are all examples of this type of prejudice and hatred. Racism manifests itself in both people’s attitudes and actions, such as racial jokes and name-calling, as well as situations in which people are excluded from groups or activities on the basis of their ethnic origin. Racism is a multifaceted phenomenon that extends beyond thoughts, words, attitudes, and behaviours. It encompasses all barriers that prevent people from experiencing dignity and equality on the basis of their race or origin.
With this in mind, it is extremely important to emphasize that racism is a serious issue that should not be taken lightly, nor should it be used as a weapon to manipulate individuals, groups, or situations.
The dangers of false allegations of racism, especially when facts are not fully disclosed.
- False accusations of racism are hurtful, disrespectful, and an affront to a person’s integrity and character.
- Unverified and false accusations of racism can be just as divisive in a country emerging from a history of racism as actual examples of racism. It could be detrimental to any projects aimed at fostering better race relations, re-establishing racial harmony, or progressing toward a future marked by racial equality.
- When false accusations of racism are made, it can have a negative impact on those who are true victims of racism, as employers in organisations may take their accusations less seriously.
- There are also negative consequences for those accused and their family members, including emotional, physiological, psychological, social, and economic consequences. People do not simply move on with their lives, and such a stigma can follow a person for the rest of their lives, even if the allegations are proven false.
Racism is generally not tolerated in society, and in some instances, a genuine case of racism may result in civil, criminal and financial penalties. Racism is a serious issue. A very serious issue. Perhaps those who make flagrantly false accusations should also face serious repercussions. However, this area is unquestionably complex and sensitive, and it warrants its own discussion. Individuals should always be free to report racist incidents without fear of reprisal. It must, however, be done responsibly, as unfounded charges of racism can have a detrimental effect on an individual, a community, and society as a whole.
 McGovney-Ingram, R. L. (2013). Race, gender, and media practices: A critical framing analysis of the media’s coverage of USDA worker Shirley Sherrod. Texas A&M University.